Chad Walstrom <chewie(_at_)wookimus(_dot_)net> wrote:
Neil W Rickert wrote:
nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably
buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.
Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU
project "mailutils"?
Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH
support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though.
I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or
not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this.
I seem to recall (an I may be wrong here), that mailutils did a
one-folder-per-file thing, instead on nmh's one-message-per-file.
I don't want to lose one-message-per-file, it's one of nmh's great strengths.
Jon
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers