From: Bill Wohler <wohler(_at_)newt(_dot_)com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:20:02 -0700 Chad Walstrom <chewie(_at_)wookimus(_dot_)net> wrote:Neil W Rickert wrote:nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU project "mailutils"?Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though. I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this.
When I looked a while back, it appeared that just enough had been implemented
to support MH-E, but not enough to support exmh.
Clearly someone with the required C skills needs to get inspired to flesh out
other parts of the package so the other MH front ends can work.
Sadly, that person isn't me.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074
512-322-0180 http://www.trinsics.com
Would you rather proactively pay for
uptime or reactively pay for downtime?
Trinsic Solutions
Your Proactive IT Management Partner
pgpwEoWsJHQMj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers