On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:33:40 EST, Paul Fox said:
i believe there was consensus that a) this behavior was a result of a problem with the original content encoding, and that b) the nmh decoder should be more tolerant when decoding, and simply pass mis-codings through untouched.
I'd have to think *real* hard about that. I suspect that passing mis-codings through without a complaint is possibly setting us up for a nasty security exposure. I'm not convinced that it isn't possible to create an intentional bad encoding that causes issues further down the line.
pgpSFe6GeG1os.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers