sigh.
i'm getting tired of mh. i just had to hand-edit this draft
because my painstakingly constructed combination of reply command
shell script and draft editor that takes care of html content,
etc, and which works on almost all mail i regularly receive can't
handle your pgp multipart cruft.
i see you're using exmh. i'm certainly glad mh is still useful
somewhere -- too bad the useful version had to end up being the
gui version.
well. that end-of-day grumble aside...
The fun starts when different things along the way use different rules - if
your mail malware scanner deletes bad characters when doing its checks, but
your final MUA doesn't, the bad characters can be used as part of a malicious
payload invisible to the malware scanner.
are you really saying there's no way to present the data in a way
that's secure, when what we're talking about is final
presentation?
i really really wouldn't care if mh applied multiple hex
encodings with shrieking warnings to the several characters
surrounding the mis-encoded ones, if it would only show me the
_rest_ of the message intact. i guess i'll go look at how hard
this might be.
paul
p.s. i'm curious -- does exmh have the "invalid
QUOTED-PRINTABLE" problem?
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 43.0 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers