Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:33:40 EST, Paul Fox said:
i believe there was consensus that a) this behavior was a result
of a problem with the original content encoding, and that b) the
nmh decoder should be more tolerant when decoding, and simply
pass mis-codings through untouched.
I'd have to think *real* hard about that.
RFC 2045 is pretty clear about what MUAs should do in the face
of a bad encoding; the idea is to follow that. (Also, anything
you can get through with odd q-p you could have got through literally.)
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers