On 6/6/2012 9:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
... Hmm, should I be worried about the fact that I'm running a pretty recent BIND on this box? I've never seen anything that looked like snprintf related misbehavior ... regards, tom lane
i'm not sure what BIND9 does. but the later BIND4's and all BIND8's called snprintf unprotectly. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane |
| Next by Thread: | [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |