nmh Workers (date)
June 26, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, David Levine, 22:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 18:26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jeffrey Honig, 18:19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 18:12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Fox, 13:15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jerrad Pierce, 13:13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 12:45
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Christian Neukirchen, 12:41
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Fox, 06:45
June 25, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 23:30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ken Hornstein, 22:21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jerrad Pierce, 22:19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 22:14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 22:08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, David Levine, 22:05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ken Hornstein, 22:03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jerrad Pierce, 22:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ken Hornstein, 22:00
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jon Steinhart, 21:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 21:34
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jon Steinhart, 21:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 21:18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ken Hornstein, 18:57
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ken Hornstein, 18:57
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Jon Steinhart, 18:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 17:58
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Tethys, 17:43
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Yoshi Rokuko, 12:57
June 24, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] deprecate conflict(8)?, Ken Hornstein, 17:59
- Re: [Nmh-workers] deprecate conflict(8)?, Paul Vixie, 16:40
- [Nmh-workers] deprecate conflict(8)?, David Levine, 15:05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, David Levine, 12:55
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ralph Corderoy, 08:13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Fox, 07:38
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, Robert Elz, 06:50
June 22, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, Jerrad Pierce, 20:38
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, David Levine, 18:08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, David Levine, 17:57
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, David Levine, 17:56
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, Jerrad Pierce, 17:51
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Vixie, 17:22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Ken Hornstein, 09:27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, norm, 09:19
- [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?, Paul Fox, 09:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, David Levine, 08:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable, norm, 06:43
June 18, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Jeffrey Honig, 09:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Ken Hornstein, 09:38
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, David Levine, 09:09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Ralph Corderoy, 08:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Ralph Corderoy, 08:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Ken Hornstein, 07:24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Ralph Corderoy, 06:14
June 17, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Ken Hornstein, 19:00
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, David Levine, 15:51
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, Jerrad Pierce, 15:43
- [Nmh-workers] does dist work?, David Levine, 15:36
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new mhmail, norm, 09:03
June 14, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 10:08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, Ken Hornstein, 09:53
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 doesn't work on 64-bit big-endian archs(+patch), Ken Hornstein, 09:38
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 09:28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 09:26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 08:53
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 08:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 doesn't work on 64-bit big-endian archs(+patch), David Levine, 08:20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 doesn't work on 64-bit big-endian archs (+patch), Alexander Zangerl, 07:25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 doesn't work on 64-bit big-endian archs (+patch), Ken Hornstein, 07:15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!, Alexander Zangerl, 03:29
- [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 doesn't work on 64-bit big-endian archs (+patch), Alexander Zangerl, 03:29
June 13, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 23:02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, Ken Hornstein, 21:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 18:47
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 13:36
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, Ken Hornstein, 13:24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, Paul Fox, 13:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 13:06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 11:46
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, Ken Hornstein, 10:55
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 08:41
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 08:00
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!, Kevin Cosgrove, 01:40
June 12, 2012
- [Nmh-workers] mhmail -from, David Levine, 19:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail, David Levine, 12:58
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!, David Levine, 12:23
- [Nmh-workers] mhmail, norm, 11:19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!, Alexander Zangerl, 06:29
June 10, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!, Kevin Cosgrove, 23:50
- [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!, Ken Hornstein, 23:43
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 14:37
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 12:54
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 11:07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 10:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 10:40
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 09:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 09:34
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is nowavailable, David Levine, 09:33
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, Alexander Zangerl, 08:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Tethys, 03:45
June 09, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 23:22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 23:11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 23:02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Alexander Zangerl, 22:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 22:40
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 22:24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 21:47
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 21:01
- [Nmh-workers] new warning about repeated profile components, David Levine, 09:42
- [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 08:57
June 06, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, valdis . kletnieks, 20:41
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ralph Corderoy, 20:20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, paul vixie, 20:05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Kevin Cosgrove, 19:41
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 19:30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 18:40
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 17:13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, paul vixie, 16:34
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 16:27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, paul vixie, 16:17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 15:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 15:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 14:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, David Levine, 12:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Ken Hornstein, 12:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Lyndon Nerenberg, 12:39
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Ken Hornstein, 12:26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 12:21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, JerryHeyman, 12:19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, David Levine, 12:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 12:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Ken Hornstein, 12:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Lyndon Nerenberg, 11:59
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Paul Fox, 11:51
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, Ken Hornstein, 11:39
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, David Levine, 11:31
- [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 11:19
- [Nmh-workers] Exit status when argument is -version, norm, 11:12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 01:17
June 05, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 23:28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Kevin Cosgrove, 23:08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 22:44
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 22:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 22:03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 21:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 21:22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, JerryHeyman, 20:45
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 20:03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 15:11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 14:44
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 13:38
- [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 13:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Naive Queston About nmh Man Pages, David Levine, 09:06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Naive Queston About nmh Man Pages, norm, 07:59
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Naive Queston About nmh Man Pages, Ken Hornstein, 07:46
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Naive Queston About nmh Man Pages, norm, 07:35
June 03, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Naive Queston About nmh Man Pages, Ken Hornstein, 14:37
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, Ken Hornstein, 14:37
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, Kevin Cosgrove, 10:46
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, Jerrad Pierce, 10:17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, norm, 10:03
- [Nmh-workers] Naive Queston About nmh Man Pages, norm, 09:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, Ken Hornstein, 09:40
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, norm, 07:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, norm, 07:09
June 01, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [PATCH] mhbuild: implement #on/#off/#pop, and the -[no]directives switch, Paul Fox, 15:26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [PATCH] mhbuild: implement #on/#off/#pop, and the -[no]directives switch, Ken Hornstein, 14:33
- Re: [Nmh-workers] draft validation, error checking, Paul Fox, 12:26
- [Nmh-workers] The third release candidate of nmh is now available, Ken Hornstein, 11:17