On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:40:03 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:
I was curious, so I went back and looked ... while MH-6.8.5 couldn't decode RFC 2047-encoded headers, that code was added by Richard Coleman .... in 1998. So every release of nmh since 1999 has had support for that :-)however: that being said, neither your one-liner above, nor a "scan -form <nmh-etc-dir>/scan.default" of the messages in question does the right thing. clearly they should, so clearly now the problem is on my end.I see that you figured out it was MM_CHARSET, which leads me to ask another question. I don't actually use MM_CHARSET myself; if it's not set then nmh simply falls back to using your locale setting (assuming you have support for the nl_langinfo() function). Why do people use MM_CHARSET instead of just their locale setting?
I suspect a lot of old-timers are still dragging that setting around from 1998 when locale settings were still iffy on many systems (which is why MM_CHARSET was added rather that using the locale setting).
pgpM9MxUb1u9g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |