Hi Paul,
> /bin/sh -c 'proc arg1 arg2 arg3'
>
> and so on, but that would involve an extra level of shell
> interpretation.
i'm not clear on what's so wrong with the above. i assume proc would
be expanded, so you'd end up with
/bin/sh -c 'less -aics arg1 arg2 arg3'
I think arg2 may be something that has characters that are significant
to the shell but are intended to be treated literally.
Cheers, Ralph.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers