On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:38:13 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:
if "the MH way" could expand to C89 and posix threads, we'd have some options that were both performance and correct.I think we already assume C89 as a minimum. However, I'm not sure I want to jump off the threads cliff just yet :-/
"Some people see a problem and say "I know, I'll use threads". Now they have two problems" - jwz, misquoted. :)
pgpuk66ejUgEV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Lyndon Nerenberg |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences), Paul Vixie |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |