I just tried to do this myself, and I got the expected result. So I
am not sure this is nmh's fault.
Received: from unix.hobbeshollow.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by unix.hobbeshollow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B8CAE0
for <heymanj(_at_)acm(_dot_)org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 12:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: heymanj(_at_)acm(_dot_)org
From: heymanj(_at_)bellsouth(_dot_)net
Reply-To: jerry(_at_)hobbeshollow(_dot_)com
Subject: testing messages
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:49:34 -0400
Message-Id:
<20130608164935(_dot_)08B8CAE0(_at_)unix(_dot_)hobbeshollow(_dot_)com>
So ... the _text_ of the message contains a Received: line? That
suggests to me that nmh is _not_ at fault, because nmh will never add a
Received: header to a draft.
I am guessing by the headers of this message (which was your message
body) that you are using SMTP to submit to a copy of postfix running on
your local machine (either directly with smtp, or via running sendmail
-bs). This suggests to me that the problem lies somewhere within the
local instance of Postfix. You said that Mailx doesn't do the same thing,
but I suspect that the difference there is that it's feeding the message
to sendmail on standard input (sendmail -t) instead of speaking SMTP.
Now, as for solutions ... well, you could test to see if this is the problem
by setting up send/post to send to another server. Or you could simply
replicate it by running /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs and doing SMTP yourself
with a hand-crafted message.
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers