On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
That's fine ... so what's wrong with the scheme we used for 1.5?
It was just a wee bit scatter-shot. I'm looking for a more consistent naming scheme. What I suggest loosely follows the FreeBSD release model in their repo. But we use git, vs. their svn, so things don't map directly. My concern is to have a cutoff point in the code base where we can definitively say '1.6 starts here' and divorce it from 'lyndon just imported plan 9 support'. I'm trying to work out a scheme that is very light weight, but makes room for the heretics to carry on while the pedants try to ship a release. (Being in both camps, I hate being ripped to shreds by the conflict!)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers