On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:43 PM, heymanj(_at_)bellsouth(_dot_)net wrote:
Ok - then making the local variable 'i' unsigned would work, but that would get into the middle of the flex generation.
What is the filename and line number of this declaration of 'i'? I'm guessing this is in the .c output from the corresponding .l file? Sorry, but this isn't entirely clear to me from your description.
[jerry@unix Downloads]$ rpm -qa | grep flex
'flex -V' please? What was built doesn't always match the package builder's idea of what was built :-)
Linux unix.hobbeshollow.com 3.10.44-desktop-1.mga3 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17 06:09:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
But what is the actual Linux distribution? Release number? Patch level? (I don't run Linux, so I can't derive that info from the kernel version stamps.) --lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |