On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
But here's the thing I really want to get at. People bring up FUSE
as a viable interface for nmh to use for IMAP. The point I'm trying
to make is: as far as I can tell, a FUSE interface to IMAP does _not_
solve the above problem; you still have to deal with it. And I believe
it makes it WORSE; each nmh command starts with a brand-new scan of a
folder, so messages added or removed between commands work out fine.
But this makes it *your* turn to come up with an insane idea.
Waiting ...
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers