Hello Ken,
Ken Hornstein writes:
[...]
I am feeling reasonably confident about the quality of nmh 1.7 release
candidate 3. To that end, I sure would appreciate it if you had not had
a chance yet to test any nmh 1.7 release candidates, that you give RC3 a
try. If there are no issues with RC3 I hope to go to 1.7 final within
a week or two; widespread testing would greatly assist this process. So
if you have a moment or two to spare, give RC3 a try and let us know how
it works for you. If you've already done that, then thank you!
[...]
That's a great news!
Back on how it works... I can confirm that the several bugs that
affected early 1.7 RCs and I was able to reproduce are fixed on 1.7RC3.
I have also run the tests on NetBSD/amd64 8.99.1 against 1.7RC3 and...:
[...]
====================
All 110 tests passed
(1 test was not run)
====================
[...]
(the 1 test not run was the one that required valgrind, so it was
expected and not a regression).
Thank you and all nmh developers and community that made that possible!
Keep up the good work!
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers