On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:21:03 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:
A better question is ... do you consider a "scan 1-10426" taking 10 seconds reasonable?
Well, on my laptop (Dell Latitude, 16G RAM, unfortunately still spinning oxide), scanning a local folder. 2 runs, first memory-cache cold second cache-hot: 0 [~] time bash -c '(scan +linux-kernel 1-10426 > /dev/null)' real 0m17.625s user 0m1.610s sys 0m3.358s 0 [~] time bash -c '(scan +linux-kernel 1-10426 > /dev/null)' real 0m2.164s user 0m0.850s sys 0m1.267s 0 [~] So some of us are seeing 10+ second scans locally. I really need to upgrade to a 500G SSD. :) (which I guess answers the "is it reasonable/tolerable" question :)
pgp70bNJW6js6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers