But my point is that combination should be fine (the email address there should be interpreted by rcvdist; instead it is being passed to post).It's up to the user to get it right.
But if the user wants to only pass a switch argument to post that does NOT take an argument, it's not possible from them to get it right. --Ken -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] rcvdist with non-default port, Steven Winikoff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] rcvdist with non-default port, David Levine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] rcvdist with non-default port, David Levine |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] rcvdist with non-default port, Steven Winikoff |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |