Ralph wrote:
Hi Ken,We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going forward;Don't think David commented?
I agree with Paul F to deprecate support for absence of iconv now and to remove it from next release. Just to note that iconv support is included in GNU glibc. So this change would be (or given its broad support, will be) transparent to package maintainers on Linux platforms, at least. David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, David Levine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Nmh-workers] GCC 8 pre-releases have escaped..., valdis . kletnieks |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |