On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:57:49 -0500, Ken Hornstein writes:
So I think when stripping Bcc out of the original draft and putting it IN the Bcc draft makes the most sense.
done. patch is attached.
or should post with sendmail/pipe reject messages with dcc?I firmly believe that post should reject the message immediately and nothing should be sent.
also done. i've updated the post and send manpages a little; they now both spell out the bcc/dcc situation more or less the same way and do mention the dcc rejection aspect. regards az
15-bcc-pipe
Description: Text Data
-- Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 2FCCF66BB963BD5F + http://snafu.priv.at/ When you understand UNIX, you will understand the world. When you understand NT....you will understand NT -- R. Thieme
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
-- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1: both bcc and dcc broken for mts sendmail/pipe, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nmh-workers] Gmail Bounces. (Was: nmh 1.7.1: both bcc and dcc broken for mts sendmail/pipe), Ralph Corderoy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1: both bcc and dcc broken for mts sendmail/pipe, Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nmh-workers] Gmail Bounces. (Was: nmh 1.7.1: both bcc and dcc broken for mts sendmail/pipe), Ralph Corderoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |