On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:08:41 -0500, Ken Hornstein said:
Valdis was the first reply to that (Message-ID <22277.1550182604@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>), and HIS email was text/plain, character set iso-8859-1, and encoded using quoted-printable. He quoted Ralph's message, and the guillemets were encoded as =AB and =BB. Which seems correct to me.
But in Paul's note it ended up as (extra > added in the reply) > > The =AB" =BB around
There's something else wonky about Paul's note. My preliminary guess is that something got mangled when MailMan tacked the us-ascii footer onto Paul's utf-8. The end result is that exmh gets confoozled, even though it usually gets this sort of thing right. Not sure yet why, and I don't see anything in the raw message that would cause this. Damn. Now it's going to bug me till I figure it out. :)
paul-wonky-reply.png
Description: paul-wonky-reply.png
-- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers