Valdis Klētnieks wrote in <235182.1574454918@turing-police>:
|On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:51:52 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso said:
|
|> I prefer people using Mail-Followup-To: instead of some ML
|> software modifying the address lists, they could as well just
|> avoid resending the mail!?! Yes, i mean, well.
|> I really like looking into old archives and i hope what i see is
|> the real original thing, which i think is a value by itself.
|> But the world does not seem to cherish this.
|
|A bigger issue is GMail's handling of Message-Id:
|
|If you post to a mailing list, it notes the Message-Id: on the way out,
|and when the list sends its copy to you, it gets silently munched by the
|duplicate suppressor. So unless you are careful with Fcc: and have
|nmh save a copy in the appropriate folder, your comments in a thread
|go poof.
Poof also in use to spring out of existence.
To me such situations happen regulary even without GMail ._.
Before the upcoming release of my MUA i will have to add
a reply-to-swapin variable so one can use the address in Reply-To:
not only as an exclusive receiver override (as with M-F-T:), but
only to replace the one address in From: (or Sender:) with it.
This is the only idea i have to work with DKIM++ the way it is in
use on those lists which use the "x via y" syntax.
(Even if noone wants to hear just about any critics regarding
DKIM / DMARC / ARC, neither here nor on other lists.)
--End of <235182.1574454918@turing-police>
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)