On Mon, 07 Feb 2022 17:31:16 +0000, Ralph Corderoy writes: [about install-recommends: false]
I use that option too on APT systems, I expect that's quite common.
so do i, liking my systems to be minimally encrusted with 'helpful' extras.
The nmh package in Debian's Testing depends on 'libsasl2-2 >= 2.1.27+dfsg2'. https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/nmh
yes, because without that dependency as a minimum none of the sasl-ish access bits will be built in.
Ken, Can nmh make any use of libsasl2-2 without libsasl2-modules also being installed?
i'll look at that a bit later as well, but ken seems to have hit the nail on the head with his 'no'...(the rationale for the actual split into libsasl and the modules package is, well, a bit beyond me.)
If not, then I wonder if nmh should depend on libsasl2-modules instead of, or as well as, libsasl2-2 as otherwise it's too easy for Debian users to have a needless installation of libsasl2-2 which also lures them into thinking all's well..
you've got a good point there; i'll think about it a bit but will likely make that change.
If libsasl2-2 is useful to nmh without libsasl2-modules then perhaps nmh's package description should mention the extra package which is required for authentication in this way.
if the recommends doesn't get raised to depends, then i'll definitely add that to the next nmh upload. regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 2FCCF66BB963BD5F + http://snafu.priv.at/ Fachbegriffe der Informatik, HTTP: Hot Tits Transport Pr0nocol. -- Ulrich Schwarz
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature