Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?

I thought there was supposed to be a sequence of zero length.

Charlie

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeffrey I. Schiller Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Charles W. Gardiner <= Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Steve Kent Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Steve Kent Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry

Previous by Date:	Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeffrey I. Schiller
Next by Date:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry
Previous by Thread:	Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeffrey I. Schiller
Next by Thread:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]