Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?

Jeff,

        My copy of the RFC specifies the revokedCertificates element as 
OPTIONAL.
        This means that if there are no entries then there is no encoding and
therefore
        the NULL does not belong.

John

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeffrey I. Schiller Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Charles W. Gardiner Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry <= Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Steve Kent Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Steve Kent Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider

Previous by Date:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Charles W. Gardiner
Next by Date:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark
Previous by Thread:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Charles W. Gardiner
Next by Thread:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]