Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?

  > The ASN.1 says that it is optional. That probably means that it doesn't
  > need to be present. However I agree with you, if present it should probably
  > be a null sequence (the code I have will accept a null sequence).
  > 
  >                     -Jeff

I would think that either an empty SEQUENCE OF CRLEntry or no
revokedCertificates would be valid but a NULL is not.

 -Ray

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, (continued) Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeffrey I. Schiller Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Charles W. Gardiner Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeff Thompson Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau <= Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau

Previous by Date:	Requesting certificates, TCJones
Next by Date:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau
Previous by Thread:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry
Next by Thread:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]