Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?

Paul,

        I give up.

        Encode your CRLs any way you want.

John

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, (continued) Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeffrey I. Schiller Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Charles W. Gardiner Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeff Thompson Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, John Lowry <= Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Wolfgang Schneider Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau

Previous by Date:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Paul C. Clark
Next by Date:	Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeff Thompson
Previous by Thread:	Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Jeff Thompson
Next by Thread:	Re: Proper way to represent a NULL (no entries) CRL?, Raymond Lau
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]