Peter,
What's interesting is that although your email address is a horrendous
X.400 string, a very simple, clean Internet email address somehow
materialized.
Here is the set of headers when your message arrived in my mailbox.
To: Jueneman(_at_)gte(_dot_)com
Cc: pem-dev(_at_)tis(_dot_)com,
"Peter Williams, Computer Science, University College London, GB"
<"/I=P/S=Williams/OU=cs/O=ucl/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD=GOLD 400/C=GB/"@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Encoding e-mail addresses as DN's: draft
From: "Peter Williams, Computer Science, University College London, GB"
<"/I=P/S=Williams/OU=cs/O=ucl/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD=GOLD 400/C=GB/"@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Mar 94 16:46:54 EST."
<9403092153(_dot_)AA02260(_at_)bunny(_dot_)gte(_dot_)com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 94 23:55:57 +0000
Sender: P(_dot_)Williams(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
When I asked my system to reply, it generated:
To: "Peter Williams, Computer Science, University College London,
GB" <"/I=P/S=Williams/OU=cs/O=ucl/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD=GOLD
400/C=GB/"@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
cc: Jueneman(_at_)gte(_dot_)com, pem-dev(_at_)tis(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: Encoding e-mail addresses as DN's: draft
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Mar 94 23:55:57 GMT."
<9403092357(_dot_)AA06564(_at_)relay(_dot_)tis(_dot_)com>
Like Bob, I could see that the To: address doesn't have a chance, so I
substituted the address in the Sender: line from above. None of us
would have any trouble representing it as a set of DCs and an RM.
Steve