procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Reply to field

1997-01-09 06:49:55
On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 tbac(_at_)mail(_dot_)idt(_dot_)net wrote:

-I"Reply: diablo(_at_)mydom(_dot_)com"\
-I"Reply_to: diablo(_at_)mydom(_dot_)com"\

I believe you should use Reply-To: and not Reply_To: (a dash instead of 
an underscore). Also, I don't think there is something like a Reply: 
header field. At least, I never saw one.

--
Guy Geens <guy(_dot_)geens(_at_)elis(_dot_)rug(_dot_)ac(_dot_)be>
Home Page: (to be announced)
finger ggeens(_at_)elis(_dot_)rug(_dot_)ac(_dot_)be for PGP public keys (or use 
keyserver) 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>