procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re-Sent Date?

1997-05-28 02:40:00
Philip Guenther writes on 27 May 1997 at 15:35:14
[...]
wondering about the purpose of the header itself, their meaning has
gradually changed (some would say been clarified), and the current
thought is that thet are strictly informational, and not to be used by

both "formail -r" and "formail -rt" use the address in the
Resent-From: header, even if there is a Reply-To: header.  In light of
the "strictly informational" comment, is this the desired behavior?

   Dan
------------------- message is author's opinion only ------------------
J. Daniel Smith <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>        
http://www.bristol.com/~DanS
Bristol Technology B.V.                   +31 33 450 50 50, ...51 (FAX)
Amersfoort, The Netherlands               {info,jobs}(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>