procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Exitcode changes to zero when I asked for 67 ?

1997-09-09 06:37:15

W. Wesley Groleau asked,
| [why is this...]
| procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=EXITCODE=67"
| procmail: Opening "EXITCODE=67"
| procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
| procmail: Notified comsat: 
"wwgrol(_at_)64416:/usr/home/wwgrol/Mail/EXITCODE=67"
| procmail: Assigning "EXITCODE=0"
| 
| The recipe is
| 
| :0
| * condition(s) withheld in case the bomber reads this list  :-)
| EXITCODE=67

And Dave explained I should do

 :0
 * conditions
 { EXITCODE=67 }

James went a little further:

 :0
 * conditions
 { 
   EXITCODE=67 
   :0 
   /dev/null
 }

It appears James is right--unless you want to fiddle with the message even
though you said it bounced.  Once you set EXITCODE, is it impossible for a
subsequent recipe to change it?