A person named Terry Todd posted a couple of messages concerning trouble
subscribing from the Subject: line. On my end, the strangest thing
happened. The headers of the messages he sent showed that the messages
were to/from tlt(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net(_dot_) Shaknet is my
machine, and Todd does
not have an account here. What is going on? The headers are included below
for your information:
This is the first subscribe example he posted.
From tlt(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net Sun Sep 14 08:24:07 1997
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 05:30:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Terry Todd <tlt(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net>
To: tea-room(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net
Subject: subscribe
This is the header from the one that showed the verbose logfile.
From tlt(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net Sun Sep 14 08:24:22 1997
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 05:31:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: Terry Todd <tlt(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net>
To: tea-room(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net
subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The verbose log file contents:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
procmail: [11541] Sun Sep 14 05:30:22 1997
procmail: Assigning "off_threshold=24476"
procmail: Assigning "reject_threshold=24476"
procmail: Unlocking "request.lock"
<snip>
I never saw this behavior before.
One net to rule them all, one net to find them, one net to bring them all
and using Unix bind them. alan_s(_at_)shaknet(_dot_)clark(_dot_)net
*Stamp out Spam...Boycott companies who use unsolicited commercial email*