Matt wrote,
| Is it possible for there to be more than one Date: header in a message
| (even if it's not legal)? If so, and the second one has the overflow,
| the above recipe would miss it.
Yes, and I had been thinking of that and decided not to address it, but Matt
is right: for this problem, no scone should go unburned. So as I read his
response, at this point, the rest was exactly what I was thinking.
| I don't know how likely this is,
| or whether Outlook would be affected by the repeated header fields,
| but it's just a thought.... Personally, i'm sticking with the non-
| scoring, lotsa-dots recipe. :)
And that's a very good plan:
:0 # forty-five periods
* ^Date:.............................................
/dev/null
For myself, I've already upgraded to OE 5.5, which isn't susceptible to that
bug.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail