At 11:52 2000-11-23 -0600, David W. Tamkin wrote:
| Hock a semicolon between them.
No, do not add a semicolon.
My bad. As indicated, I don't use the exitcode stuff to bounce messages.
However, 75 is probably a bad choice, as it
requeues the message for another try. 67 or 77 would be better.
Are you saying that sendmail is keeping the SMTP session upen until
procmail has successfully delivered it to the local mailbox? I had rather
been working on the expectation that the SMTP was completed and the remote
server handed a successful completion code. Thus the difference in bounces
which you get from your _own_ mailer daemon (those caught during SMTP
transactions), and bounces mailed to you from the remote server (those
which resulted in LDA faults which resolved after the SMTP was closed, and
thus sendmail had to fire off a new message in reply).
(not that even if =75 would work that I'd use it - guaranteed way to piss
off your admin if s/he knew what you were doing).
---
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Post Box 2395 / San Rafael, CA 94912-2395
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail