On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Philip Choy wrote:
Headers from message:
{trimmed a bit}
From s033226(_at_)income(_dot_)com(_dot_)sg Wed Apr 24 10:29:15 2002
Received: from Crn ([10.33.42.62])
by vanda.income.com.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA104336
for <z310062(_at_)income(_dot_)com(_dot_)sg>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:29:10
+0800 (SGT)
From: s015354 <s015354(_at_)income(_dot_)com(_dot_)sg>
To: z310062(_at_)income(_dot_)com(_dot_)sg
I am using santizier version 1.134. And, i notice that it respond
to s015354, instead of s033226. You know, Klez spoofs the email
addresses. The santizier has replied to most of spoofed email
addresses, instead of original ones.. creating confusion among the
senders. Is there any way to tweak santizier respond to s033226,
instead of s015354? ie original sender, rather than spoofed one.
The sanitizer just uses formail's "generate reply headers" function.
What version of procmail are you using?
I'm including the procmail list in my reply.
Philip (on the procmail list), is there some reason that "formail -r"
seems to be using the From: header rather than the From_ header to
generate the reply address?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin(_at_)impsec(_dot_)org pgpk -a
jhardin(_at_)wolfenet(_dot_)com
768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"They [media giants] have no idea how to do business with resourceful
human beings rather than passive vegetables. So they run to [the]
government for protection."
-- Doc Searls on the SSSCA, in Linux Journal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
924 days until the Presidential Election
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail