On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, John Cottingham wrote:
JC> The first line in evaluations should be:
JC>
JC> * ! ^FROM_DAEMON
JC>
JC> But the definition when it expands includes some words that crafty
JC> spammers are using in their reply-to including "owner" and "bounce".
JC>
JC> How can we prevent loops and still cause the evaluations to be tested?
JC>
I have long since concluded that using anything to do with addresses to
filter spam is almost always a waste of time. By the time your mail hits
the daemon test, you need to have filtered out the spam.
Alan
( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Personal
email is welcome but may invoke a password autoresponder. )
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail