Tastlessly following up on myself:
| [...] I'm deliberately
| not setting Reply-To: this time to see what happens. I'm guessing it'll
| be another message to procmail(_at_)tradersdata(_dot_)com that'll bounce. If
I
| were really evil I'd set Reply-To: opt-in(_at_)oin81(_dot_)com, but I'm not.
edited excerpts:
Nov 20 17:53:53 sendmail[5657]: <procmail(_at_)tradersdata(_dot_)com>... User
unknown
Nov 20 17:53:53 sendmail[5657]: lost input channel [...]
Nov 20 17:53:53 sendmail[5657]: from=<tallison(_at_)tacocat(_dot_)net>
Hello. McTom. Anybody home?
--
Reply to list please, or append "8" to "procmail" in address if you must.
Spammers' unrelenting address harvesting forces me to this...reluctantly.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail