From: Dallman Ross [mailto:dman(_at_)nomotek(_dot_)com]
:0 fw # we'll add an X-Loop and bounce these
* some conditions
| formail -rtzk \
-I"X-Loop: admin(_at_)someaddress(_dot_)com" \
-i"Subject: List Submission Failure" | \
$SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS -t
The first line, with the "f" and "w" flags, does not
belong there at all. I merged two experiments together
in my late-night post.
This is correct:
:0 # we'll add an X-Loop and bounce these
#* some conditions
| formail -rtzk \
-I"X-Loop: admin(_at_)someaddress(_dot_)com" \
-i"Subject: List Submission Failure" | \
$SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS -t
Here's the result on your saved headers and the list tag
that I left at the end for a simulated body:
To: benj(_at_)connexus(_dot_)net(_dot_)au
References: <3E94190C(_dot_)8040800(_at_)connexus(_dot_)net(_dot_)au>
In-Reply-To: <3E94190C(_dot_)8040800(_at_)connexus(_dot_)net(_dot_)au>
Subject: List Submission Failure
X-Loop: admin(_at_)someaddress(_dot_)com
And the new "Old-Subject:" field is also there. Once I
removed the errant `f' option to my recipe, it appeared
as expected.
--
"Weltbedenkend, ortlich lenkend!"
-- Original von Dallman Ross
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail