At 16:10 2003-06-02 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. did say:
> Try running this in a SANDBOX, using a test message which you know it
> should respond to, and then review the VERBOSE logfile.
I did that, and the log file shows the message being sent and that is
it. It does not seem to have anything in the log regarding the auto
response.
If you're running this in the sandbox which is described at my website -
which includes a shellscript replacement for sendmail, then you'd see just
what procmail is handing off to the sendmail prog, along with invocation
arguments.
I presume by the vague "message being sent" reference that you mean that
procmail is verbosely logging that it matched each of the points of
criteria and that it invoked formail and then sendmail (which would seem
like it logged a lot more than the message was _sent_)? or do you mean
that procmail is only logging that you _received_ the message, in which
case, you need to ask yourself why it didn't verbosely log each of the
conditions of the autoresponder recipe...
Please keep in mind that absolutely nobody here knows what your test
message contained or whether it met the criterial of the recipe.
The last time I tried to read someones mind, I saw some disturbing images,
so I don't use that special power anymore.
I am still getting familiar with Sendmail. Can you suggest a way for me
to turn the level of logging up? Or is it always on verbose?
'man sendmail' or check the "bat book". Perhaps you should verify what it
is that procmail is doing with the message first -- a proper sandbox setup
should do that.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail