As it was written on Sep 8, thus Ruud H.G. van Tol typed:
Ruud: Toen ik David W. Tamkin kietelde, kwam er dit uit:
Ruud: > Ruud asked Birl,
Ruud:
Ruud: >> Is sed supposed to be executable?
Ruud:
Ruud: > Yes, it is. Since it's a binary and not a shell script, it beats me
how
Ruud: > you'd run it if it isn't executable.
Ruud:
Ruud: You're reading me wrong. I also wrote:
Ruud:
Ruud: >> (On my local procmail it is, on my ISP's setup it isn't.)
Ruud:
Ruud: And this was all to be read in the context of (a non-interactive)
Ruud: .procmailrc, since sed runs for him in other situations.
Ruud:
Ruud: The message Birl published, was about 'no permission'. So let's suppose
Ruud: that sed is there. Maybe also in some unexpected location, which a
verbose
Ruud: log output will show.
Ruud: He already mentioned that smrsh is not used, and that '/usr/bin' is used.
Ruud: But '/usr/bin' is not in his path. Both '/bin/date' and '/usr/bin/date'
Ruud: work for him.
Ruud:
Ruud: --
Ruud: Affijn, Ruud
Well to cut this thread short, it looks like the problem lies with me not
tinkering with config.h before compiling. The whole
#define RESTRICT_EXEC 100
line is, more than likely, what's screwing up filtering.
I'll tinker with the config.h, recompile and see what happens.
Also, although /usr/bin was not in my path /bin is a symlink to /usr/bin.
So unless procmail frowns upon symlinks, the path should be OK.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail