At 02:13 2003-11-28 -0600, Jay Moore wrote:
[big snip, little of which needed to be sent again]
Beyond that, if anyone's interested I'll try to locate all of the bounced
messages / failed deliveries from my earlier attempts to subscribe via email.
Uh, no thanks. If I were to try to diagnose the problem, I'd start by
sending a message to the known list address myself.
It is obvious that something needs to be done about some of the conflicting
and dated information presented both at procmail.org and in the procmail
program (older versions of which point to an old list address, and newer
versions of which point to procmail.org, which was a great idea - except
that it relays to an old list address).
To that end, I've sent a detailed message to the four parties involved in
those resources (I'm not - heck, I'm not even the procmail list admin, I
merely have administrative access to the list interface so as to deal with
things which arise on the list, since the the actual admin isn't a
participant), and hopefully that will net some updates. Keep in mind that
all of these people have other things making demands upon their time -
paying work, family, etc, so it might be a while before some of the
requested changes are made.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail