Re: varname=| construct broken?

procmail

Re: varname=| construct broken?

2004-02-20 13:53:54

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Ian D. wrote:

I can't get this to work at all.


Yes, it's broken, and potentially corrupts memory.

Grab <http://www.well.com/user/barts/email/procmail-3.23pre.tar.gz>
(an unofficial pre-release based on the post-3.22 dev snapshot) to
get a version with a fix.


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D. Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Bart Schaefer <= Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Dallman Ross Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D. Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Dallman Ross Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Bart Schaefer Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D. Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Dallman Ross Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D. Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Dallman Ross Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D.

Previous by Date:	varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D.
Next by Date:	RE: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net
Previous by Thread:	varname=\| construct broken?, Ian D.
Next by Thread:	Re: varname=\| construct broken?, Dallman Ross
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]