Procmail (date)
February 29, 2004
- Re[4]: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, Robert Allerstorfer, 15:25
- Re: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, Bart Schaefer, 15:08
- Re: ReVirus scanning and defense-in-depth, Bob George, 14:59
- Re: Re[2]: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, LuKreme, 14:35
- Re[2]: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, Robert Allerstorfer, 13:21
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, LuKreme, 12:15
- Multiple Matches on one Line and the use of $, Greg Ennis, 12:15
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Bart Schaefer, 11:50
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Alan Clifford, 09:50
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Robert Krueger, 08:47
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Robert Krueger, 08:37
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Robert Krueger, 08:37
- Re: procmail doesnt work after spamassassin, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 04:25
February 28, 2004
- procmail doesnt work after spamassassin, Paul Grenda, 23:07
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Andrew Edelstein, 22:37
- Re: Two simple recipes that don't work, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 21:24
- Two simple recipes that don't work, Robert Krueger, 18:10
- Multiple Matches on one Line and the use of $, Greg Ennis, 16:55
- RE: DROPPRIVS, Alan Clifford, 14:16
- RE: DROPPRIVS, Gary Funck, 12:20
- Re: DROPPRIVS, LuKreme, 12:05
February 27, 2004
- Re: DROPPRIVS, Tom Allison, 22:34
- Re: DROPPRIVS, Professional Software Engineering, 22:26
- DROPPRIVS, Tom Allison, 21:53
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, multimedia-fan, 16:27
- Re: counting message size from two different relays - solution ?, Michael Meltzer, 09:53
- RE: return codes, Gary Funck, 09:53
- RE: return codes, Gary Funck, 09:41
- RE: return codes, Gary Funck, 09:34
- Re: return codes, David W. Tamkin, 07:05
- return codes, Tom Allison, 04:30
- Re: Flood control?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:08
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:01
- Re: Delivery to wrong directories. Good practice please!, Nancy McGough, 02:27
February 26, 2004
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, David W. Tamkin, 20:41
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 20:26
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, JoeHill, 20:03
- Re: Flood control?, Professional Software Engineering, 20:03
- Re: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth (was Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?), LuKreme, 20:03
- Re: Flood control?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:58
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Professional Software Engineering, 19:54
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Gerald V. Livingston II, 19:20
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, JoeHill, 19:02
- Re: Permission problem, LuKreme, 18:59
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:36
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, JoeHill, 18:09
- Delivery to wrong directories. Good practice please!, JM Fraser, 18:09
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Dallman Ross, 17:27
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, JoeHill, 17:08
- Re: Flood control?, Alan Clifford, 15:23
- Hashed Filesystem support?, Benjamin Smith, 15:05
- Re: quotas, Shane Williams, 14:39
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Professional Software Engineering, 11:12
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, multimedia-fan, 10:41
- Re: Flood control?, Bob George, 08:31
- Re: Flood control?, Dallman Ross, 08:20
- Re: Flood control?, Bob George, 08:08
- Re: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:09
February 25, 2004
- Re: Flood control?, Bart Schaefer, 23:48
- Flood control?, Professional Software Engineering, 22:17
- Working Around Sendmail Bug, noah, 15:23
- Re: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, Dallman Ross, 15:10
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, David W. Tamkin, 14:07
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, Dallman Ross, 13:27
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, Professional Software Engineering, 12:12
- Re: Permission problem, Professional Software Engineering, 11:13
- Re: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth (was Re: tips on writing/etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?), Tim Rice, 10:42
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, Michael Meltzer, 10:26
- Permission problem, David Bourne, 10:20
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, Sebastian Krohn, 09:23
- Re[2]: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth, Robert Allerstorfer, 09:13
- Re: Virus scanning and defense-in-depth (was Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?), Dallman Ross, 08:41
- Virus scanning and defense-in-depth (was Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?), Bob George, 08:17
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, Michael Meltzer, 06:59
- Re[2]: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Robert Allerstorfer, 05:52
- Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Dallman Ross, 02:05
February 24, 2004
- More fun with clamav (was Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?), Bob George, 21:03
- Re: multiple recipients, Professional Software Engineering, 19:58
- Re: multiple recipients, Robert Krueger, 19:41
- Re: multiple recipients, Professional Software Engineering, 17:47
- Re: multiple recipients, Dallman Ross, 17:35
- Re: multiple recipients, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:00
- Re: multiple recipients, Robert Krueger, 16:03
- multiple recipients, Robert Krueger, 15:46
- Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Dallman Ross, 15:41
- Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Bob George, 15:25
- quotas, Stuart Clark, 14:48
- Re: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Charles Gregory, 14:48
- quotas, Stuart Clark, 14:44
- Re: [pro] tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Dallman Ross, 13:45
- Re: [pro] tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Charles Gregory, 12:18
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, Professional Software Engineering, 12:18
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, LuKreme, 12:07
- RE: tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Gary Funck, 10:43
- tips on writing /etc/procmailrc so that it can be run as 'root' or as a user?, Gary Funck, 10:16
- Re: mirror, Professional Software Engineering, 09:05
- Re: counting message size from two different relays, Professional Software Engineering, 09:02
- RE: counting message size from two different relays, Gary Funck, 08:32
- mirror, Arnaud Aune, 07:05
- counting message size from two different relays, Michael Meltzer, 05:54
- U= with MAILER(procmail) doesn't work, andrew fresh, 05:24
February 23, 2004
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Bart Schaefer, 09:49
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 09:12
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 08:48
- Re: multiple addresses, one recipe, LuKreme, 08:24
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, LuKreme, 08:24
February 22, 2004
- Re: Realtime Blackhole List, David Stone, 18:31
- Re: multiple addresses, one recipe, Gerald V. Livingston II, 18:27
- RE: multiple addresses, one recipe, Gary Funck, 18:20
- Re: multiple addresses, one recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:18
- multiple addresses, one recipe, JM Fraser, 17:53
- Realtime Blackhole List, Robert Krueger, 17:35
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 16:01
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Bart Schaefer, 14:57
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 13:36
- RE: Has anyone tried 'formail -n <processes>' with success?, Gary Funck, 13:36
- Re: Has anyone tried 'formail -n <processes>' with success?, David W. Tamkin, 12:28
- RE: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, Greg Ennis, 12:22
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Dallman Ross, 10:57
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, Dallman Ross, 10:44
- Has anyone tried 'formail -n <processes>' with success?, Gary Funck, 10:20
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 09:56
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 09:56
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:30
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, LuKreme, 09:15
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, LuKreme, 09:15
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 09:02
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 08:51
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:31
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Dallman Ross, 04:50
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Dallman Ross, 04:42
February 21, 2004
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 21:01
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 19:44
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 19:12
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Dallman Ross, 18:28
- whitelisting expected reply addresses, Dallman Ross, 18:22
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Robert Krueger, 18:09
- Re: how to strip SA's message markup?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:58
- RE: how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 17:53
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:48
- how to strip SA's message markup?, Gary Funck, 17:27
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Dallman Ross, 16:42
- Re: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, David W. Tamkin, 16:16
- Re: Two small questions / problems, Dallman Ross, 15:49
- RE: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, Greg Ennis, 15:34
- Re: How to bounce messages ?, Michelle Konzack, 15:12
- Two small questions / problems, Robert Krueger, 14:48
- Re: Foreign Spam ?, Dallman Ross, 14:36
- Re: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, David W. Tamkin, 14:36
- Re: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, David W. Tamkin, 14:11
- RE: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, Gary Funck, 14:11
- Re: procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, Professional Software Engineering, 14:04
- Re: Foreign Spam ?, Professional Software Engineering, 13:59
- procmail: Extraneous ignore-write-error flag ignored, Greg Ennis, 13:46
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Dallman Ross, 12:45
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Ian D., 12:23
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Ian D., 12:00
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Dallman Ross, 11:38
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Ian D., 11:19
- Re: suggestions for Dallman's Virus Snaggers 1.5, Dallman Ross, 05:35
- suggestions for Dallman's Virus Snaggers 1.5, Robert Allerstorfer, 04:01
- Foreign Spam ?, Marvin R. Pierce, 01:12
February 20, 2004
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:33
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Dallman Ross, 15:57
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Ian D., 15:34
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Bart Schaefer, 15:20
- RE: netsky virus snagger, Gary Funck, 15:20
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Dallman Ross, 15:14
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Ian D., 15:05
- RE: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net, 14:42
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Dallman Ross, 14:12
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Dallman Ross, 14:05
- RE: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net, 14:05
- Re: varname=| construct broken?, Bart Schaefer, 13:53
- varname=| construct broken?, Ian D., 13:47
- Re: netsky virus snagger, Dallman Ross, 12:28
- RE: netsky virus snagger, Gary Funck, 10:46
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Dallman Ross, 10:14
- Re: netsky virus snagger, Dallman Ross, 10:04
- netsky virus snagger, Gary Funck, 09:11
- RE: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net, 07:15
February 19, 2004
- RE: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Professional Software Engineering, 17:21
- RE: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net, 16:44
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Dallman Ross, 16:09
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Dallman Ross, 16:09
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Holger Wahlen, 16:02
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:59
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Bart Schaefer, 15:48
- Re: VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Dallman Ross, 15:28
- VirusSnag.rc - modify to clean & pass through, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net, 13:07
- Re: How to bounce messages ?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:51
- Re: How to bounce messages ?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:12
- Re: How to bounce messages ?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:38
- Re: How to bounce messages ?, LuKreme, 09:15
- Re: How to bounce messages ?, Nancy McGough, 08:46
- How to bounce messages ?, Michelle Konzack, 08:38
- Stripping attachments, Sascha Andres, 06:30
- Re: problems using Hotwayd + fetchmail+ procmai, Professional Software Engineering, 01:51
- problems using Hotwayd + fetchmail+ procmai, Tech Support, 00:14
February 18, 2004
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, David W. Tamkin, 16:53
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 16:06
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 15:36
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 14:08
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, David W. Tamkin, 11:41
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Bart Schaefer, 11:34
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 11:24
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Bart Schaefer, 10:41
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 10:22
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Bart Schaefer, 10:13
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Bart Schaefer, 09:57
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, David W. Tamkin, 09:57
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, David W. Tamkin, 09:43
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 09:36
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 09:17
February 17, 2004
- RE: Duplicates sent from lists, Gary Funck, 22:29
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Bart Schaefer, 21:07
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 19:20
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Professional Software Engineering, 16:45
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 16:04
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 14:45
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 14:38
- Re: MS-TNEF bounces., Gerald V. Livingston II, 13:53
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Gerald V. Livingston II, 13:41
- Re: rule match - exit, Bart Schaefer, 13:41
- rule match - exit, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist, 13:32
- Re: MS-TNEF bounces., Professional Software Engineering, 13:32
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 13:32
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 13:28
- Re: MS-TNEF bounces., Chris Wagner, 12:33
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Professional Software Engineering, 11:57
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Professional Software Engineering, 11:57
- Re: MS-TNEF bounces., Professional Software Engineering, 11:54
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Professional Software Engineering, 11:52
- MS-TNEF bounces., Chris Wagner, 10:31
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 10:15
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 09:55
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 09:45
- RE: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 09:09
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Professional Software Engineering, 08:47
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, David W. Tamkin, 08:15
- Re: Duplicates sent from lists, Dallman Ross, 06:18
- Duplicates sent from lists, LuKreme, 04:33
February 14, 2004
- can procmail do LDAP lookups ?, Abhinandan Sharma, 19:51
- Capturing spamc output to var, Dallman Ross, 18:18
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Bart Schaefer, 12:35
- LINEBUF (RE: More clamav testing (results)), Bart Schaefer, 12:00
- RE: weeding mail in auto forward command, Gary Funck, 11:52
- Re: weeding mail in auto forward command, Professional Software Engineering, 11:46
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Professional Software Engineering, 11:16
- weeding mail in auto forward command, Zbynek Houska, 11:16
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Dallman Ross, 10:10
- RE: More clamav testing (results), Gary Funck, 09:45
- Re: More clamav testing (results), LuKreme, 09:32
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, LuKreme, 09:32
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 09:32
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, procmail, 08:02
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Dallman Ross, 05:48
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, LuKreme, 00:08
February 13, 2004
- RE: Multiline Received header not being matched, Gary Funck, 22:45
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Bart Schaefer, 22:45
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, LuKreme, 22:36
- Re: filenames with a space in them, LuKreme, 21:48
- Re: Multiline Received header not being matched, LuKreme, 21:48
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Bart Schaefer, 18:33
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Bart Schaefer, 18:33
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Adrian Simmons, 18:22
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Dallman Ross, 18:20
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Bart Schaefer, 18:00
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 17:56
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Dallman Ross, 17:34
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Kai Weber, 16:44
- Re: More clamav testing (results), Bart Schaefer, 16:13
- More clamav testing (results), Bob George, 15:39
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Bob George, 13:27
- RE: Multiline Received header not being matched, Gary Funck, 12:56
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Bart Schaefer, 12:27
- Re: Multiline Received header not being matched, Dallman Ross, 11:59
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 11:59
- RE: Multiline Received header not being matched, David Stone, 11:59
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, David W. Tamkin, 11:48
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Bob George, 11:48
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 11:07
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 10:42
- Re: Multiline Received header not being matched, Dallman Ross, 10:42
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Kai Weber, 09:44
- RE: Multiline Received header not being matched, Gary Funck, 09:06
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Scott Wiersdorf, 09:01
- Multiline Received header not being matched, David Stone, 07:28
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 07:28
- Re: Searchable arhive broken? (was Re: Real Virus Scanner), Dallman Ross, 07:28
- Re: Searchable arhive broken? (was Re: Real Virus Scanner), Bob George, 00:22
February 12, 2004
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Marvin Pierce, 22:41
- Re: Spamassassin CPU Time, Marvin Pierce, 22:20
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, David W. Tamkin, 21:39
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Professional Software Engineering, 21:39
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Marvin Pierce, 20:46
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Professional Software Engineering, 19:56
- Re: Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Michael D Schleif, 19:33
- Re: Whose responsibility is the blank line?, Skip Montanaro, 19:33
- Procmail Received From Recipe failure, Marvin R. Pierce, 19:23
- Spamassassin CPU Time, Marvin Pierce, 19:19
- filenames with a space in them, Christopher Possanza, 16:33
- Re: Whose responsibility is the blank line?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:27
- Re: Searchable arhive broken? (was Re: Real Virus Scanner), Professional Software Engineering, 16:27
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 16:27
- (no subject), LuKreme, 15:51
- Re: Searchable arhive broken? (was Re: Real Virus Scanner), LuKreme, 15:42
- Searchable arhive broken? (was Re: Real Virus Scanner), Bob George, 15:22
- Whose responsibility is the blank line?, Skip Montanaro, 14:31
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Adrian Simmons, 13:09
- Re: EXITCODE may not be overriden after delivering recipe?, R A Lichtensteiger, 10:05
- RE: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Gary Funck, 08:53
- RE: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Gary Funck, 08:36
- Re: EXITCODE may not be overriden after delivering recipe?, Daniel Lorch, 08:36
- Removing from Header in mailarchive, Michelle Konzack, 08:27
- ANN: Procmail Sanitizer 1.140 released, John D. Hardin, 08:18
- EXITCODE may not be overriden after delivering recipe?, Daniel Lorch, 08:04
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Adrian Simmons, 07:43
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 07:43
- redirecting messages, Hans du Plooy, 05:13
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Adrian Simmons, 04:32
- Re: Generic mailing list id/filter scripts, Nancy McGough, 03:54
- Re: lock problem (recipe only works for local delivery), Nancy McGough, 03:38
February 11, 2004
- RE: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Gary Funck, 21:27
- RE: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Gary Funck, 20:23
- Re: lock problem (recipe only works for local delivery), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:23
- Re: Recipe for poorly spelled emails or blacklisted keywords?, Chris Payne, 20:23
- Re: [pro] Re: Real Virus Scanner, Charles Gregory, 20:04
- RE: Real Virus Scanner, Gary Funck, 19:35
- RE: lock problem (recipe only works for local delivery), Gary Funck, 19:35
- lock problem (recipe only works for local delivery), Floyd Hagen, 19:23
- Re: Recipe for poorly spelled emails or blacklisted keywords?, Skip Montanaro, 18:35
- Recipe for poorly spelled emails or blacklisted keywords?, Dragoncrest, 17:59
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Scott Wiersdorf, 17:25
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Scott Wiersdorf, 16:24
- RE: Real Virus Scanner, Gary Funck, 16:15
- Generic mailing list id/filter scripts, Gary Funck, 08:55
- RE: Procmail CPU Time, Gary Funck, 08:55
- Re: Procmail CPU Time, Nancy McGough, 08:37
- Problem with header across line-breaks, David Stone, 08:10
- Re: How I solved the mmm to mm, David W. Tamkin, 07:29
- Re. folder problem, Adam Bogacki, 02:28
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, LuKreme, 02:13
February 10, 2004
- Re: Procmail CPU Time, Professional Software Engineering, 23:43
- RE: Procmail CPU Time, Gary Funck, 22:55
- Procmail CPU Time, Marvin Pierce, 21:52
- Re: How I solved the mmm to mm, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:23
- Re: How I solved the mmm to mm, Dallman Ross, 16:46
- Re: How I solved the mmm to mm, Bart Schaefer, 16:25
- Re: How I solved the mmm to mm, David W. Tamkin, 16:01
- Re: Recipe Help, Professional Software Engineering, 16:01
- RE: procmail on outgiong mail, Gary Funck, 15:26
- Re: recipe destination, Robert Krueger, 14:57
- Recipe Help, Marvin Pierce, 14:52
- How I solved the mmm to mm, LuKreme, 14:33
- Re: (no subject), Professional Software Engineering, 14:33
- Re: Procmail Filtering, Professional Software Engineering, 14:33
- procmail on outgiong mail, David W. Tamkin, 13:49
- Re: (no subject), Alan Clifford, 13:34
- Re: Procmail Filtering, multimedia-fan, 11:50
February 09, 2004
- Re: recipe destination, David W. Tamkin, 22:48
- Procmail Filtering, axid3j1al axid3j1al, 22:33
- Re: (no subject), Professional Software Engineering, 21:14
- (no subject), axid3j1al axid3j1al, 20:29
- Re: empty body, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:35
- pm-jacookie.rc hwi count|=, nicholse, 18:35
- recipe destination, Robert Krueger, 18:18
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, Dallman Ross, 18:04
- Re: empty body, R A Lichtensteiger, 16:52
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, Don Hammond, 15:59
- RE: Converting from MH to mbox?, Gary Funck, 14:35
- RE: empty body, Gary Funck, 14:06
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, David W. Tamkin, 13:48
- RE: empty body, Gary Funck, 13:48
- Re: Empty Subject, multimedia-fan, 13:48
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, multimedia-fan, 13:47
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, LuKreme, 13:08
- Re: empty body, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:57
- Re: empty body, R A Lichtensteiger, 12:24
- Re: Few misc questions., Robert Krueger, 12:12
- Re: Empty Subject, Michelle Konzack, 11:07
- Re: Empty Subject, Scott Wiersdorf, 10:15
- Empty Subject, G&G Cargo(Paul Castillo), 09:36
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, David W. Tamkin, 08:51
- RE: Converting from MH to mbox?, Gary Funck, 08:39
- Re: Converting from MH to mbox?, Dallman Ross, 06:03
- Converting from MH to mbox?, LuKreme, 04:43
February 07, 2004
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Robert Krueger, 14:56
- RE: (apparent/suspected) strange umask behavior when run as root, Gary Funck, 13:50
- RE: empty body, Gary Funck, 13:45
- Re: empty body, Michael D Schleif, 13:14
- Re: (apparent/suspected) strange umask behavior when run as root, Bart Schaefer, 12:02
- Re: empty body, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:02
- Illegal characters in email-names, Lars Skovgaard, 12:02
- (apparent/suspected) strange umask behavior when run as root, Gary Funck, 11:47
- RE: empty body, Gary Funck, 11:25
- [SOLVED] Re: procmail does not filter anymore, Michelle Konzack, 08:22
- Re: make mail automatically 'read' when delvered, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:19
- Re: Real Virus Scanner, Dallman Ross, 06:16
- Re: make mail automatically 'read' when delvered, Dallman Ross, 06:06
- Re: Few misc questions., Dallman Ross, 05:54
- Re: empty body, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:21
- Re: procmail does not filter anymore, Michelle Konzack, 02:12
- procmail does not filter anymore, Michelle Konzack, 01:54
- RE: empty body, Gary Funck, 01:36
- RE: empty body, Gary Funck, 01:18
- RE: Newbie needs help with modified Vacation example, Gary Funck, 00:55
February 06, 2004
- Newbie needs help with modified Vacation example, Michael Thompson, 23:16
- Real Virus Scanner, Phil Hilton, 21:54
- Re: Spam, Andrew Edelstein, 20:04
- Re: E-Mailing the Header from within procmailrc, LuKreme, 18:03
- Re: Spam, LuKreme, 18:03
- Re: empty body, Lee Hoffner, 17:06
- Re: Few misc questions., Robert Krueger, 17:06
- Re: Few misc questions., Robert Krueger, 16:41
- Re: Logging the To address, Phil Hilton, 16:20
- Re: Logging the To address, R A Lichtensteiger, 16:11
- Re: Logging the To address, David W. Tamkin, 12:05
- Re: Logging the To address, Phil Hilton, 11:47
- Re: make mail automatically 'read' when delvered, Bart Schaefer, 10:46
- Re: Logging the To address, richard_ball, 10:46
- Re: Logging the To address, David W. Tamkin, 09:16
- Logging the To address, Phil Hilton, 08:58
- make mail automatically 'read' when delvered, JM Fraser, 08:18
- cannot get pm_jamime_save.rc to work properly (Modified by Jon Thompson), Jon Thompson, 07:55
- RE: E-Mailing the Header from within procmailrc, Greg Ennis, 07:25
- RE: block .exe, dll, bat...., Greg Ennis, 07:14
- Re: block .exe, dll, bat...., Alex Herek, 07:05
- empty body, Mike Arrison, 06:00
- Re: Few misc questions., Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:05
- Re: Few misc questions., Nancy McGough, 03:26
February 05, 2004
- Re: Few misc questions., Professional Software Engineering, 23:23
- Re: Spam, Professional Software Engineering, 23:23
- Re: E-Mailing the Header from within procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 23:23
- Re: block .exe, dll, bat...., Professional Software Engineering, 23:12
- Re: block .exe, dll, bat...., Shiju Jacob, 21:43
- Re: E-Mailing the Header from within procmailrc, Robert Krueger, 18:40
- Re: E-Mailing the Header from within procmailrc, Robert Krueger, 18:29
- RE: block .exe, dll, bat...., Greg Ennis, 18:29
- block .exe, dll, bat...., Greg Ennis, 18:15
- Re: block .exe, dll, bat...., Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:15
- Few misc questions., Robert Krueger, 17:59
- E-Mailing the Header from within procmailrc, Greg Ennis, 17:59
- block .exe, dll, bat...., Greg Ennis, 17:59
- Re: Spam, LuKreme, 14:24
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, LuKreme, 14:13
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, LuKreme, 14:07
- Re: Spam, Professional Software Engineering, 14:04
- RE: Spam, Gary Funck, 12:27
- Re: Spam, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:00
- Re: Spam, Chris Barnes, 11:35
- Re: Spam, Chris Barnes, 11:35
- Re: Who Is This Addressed To & How Do I Stop This Spam?, Robert Arnold, 03:22
February 04, 2004
- Re: Spam, Peter Rosa, 23:31
- Re: Spam, Andrew Edelstein, 22:50
- Re: Recipe Correct #2, Professional Software Engineering, 20:53
- Recipe Correct #2, Marvin Pierce, 19:45
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:34
- Re: Spam, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:34
- RE: can procmail help me?, Gary Funck, 17:06
- Re: Spam, Bart Schaefer, 16:52
- Re: can procmail help me?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:18
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, Professional Software Engineering, 16:18
- Re: Recipe Correct, Professional Software Engineering, 16:18
- Re: Spam, Professional Software Engineering, 16:18
- Re: Spam, Dallman Ross, 15:02
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, Dallman Ross, 15:02
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, Robert Arnold, 14:46
- Re: Recipe Correct, Marvin Pierce, 14:46
- Re: Spam, Bart Schaefer, 14:31
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, Lars Hecking, 14:13
- Re: Converting mmm to mm, David W. Tamkin, 14:13
- Re: can procmail help me?, Richard Witt, 14:09
- Converting mmm to mm, LuKreme, 14:01
- Re: Spam, Dallman Ross, 13:23
- Re: can procmail help me?, R A Lichtensteiger, 13:19
- Re: Spam, Chris Barnes, 13:19
- Re: Spam, Scott Wiersdorf, 13:05
- can procmail help me?, Richard WItt, 12:54
- RE: Spam, Jason Crowe, 12:52
- Re: Spam, Chris Barnes, 12:10
- Re: Spam, Chris Barnes, 10:25
- Re: Spam, Bart Schaefer, 09:46
- Re: Spam, David W. Tamkin, 07:27
- Re: occasional loop, LuKreme, 01:22
February 03, 2004
- Re: Recipe Correct, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 19:11
- Re: Recipe Correct, Professional Software Engineering, 18:54
- Recipe Correct, Marvin Pierce, 18:24
- Test - Eraseme, Marvin Pierce, 18:24
- Re: occasional loop, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:22
- RE: Spam, Gary Funck, 15:39
- Re: Spam, David W. Tamkin, 15:39
- Re: occasional loop, Professional Software Engineering, 14:51
- Re: occasional loop, Nancy McGough, 14:31
- Re: occasional loop, noah, 14:31
- Re: occasional loop, Scott Wiersdorf, 14:12
- Re: Spam, Peter Rosa, 13:57
- Re: Spam, Peter Rosa, 13:57
- Re: Spam, Alan Clifford, 13:41
- Re: occasional loop, Bart Schaefer, 13:17
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Professional Software Engineering, 13:17
- Re: ideas on filtering e-mail at the site-wide level, Professional Software Engineering, 13:02
- Re: Somehow I am not getting mbox files, Professional Software Engineering, 13:02
- Re: occasional loop, Professional Software Engineering, 13:02
- Re: Spam, Professional Software Engineering, 12:59
- Spam, Peter Rosa, 12:20
- Somehow I am not getting mbox files, LuKreme, 11:39
- RE: ideas on filtering e-mail at the site-wide level, Gary Funck, 11:05
- RE: occasional loop, Gary Funck, 10:46
- RE: occasional loop, Gary Funck, 10:19
- Re: occasional loop, Bart Schaefer, 10:19
- ideas on filtering e-mail at the site-wide level, Gary Funck, 09:57
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Tim Rice, 09:38
- RE: virus recipe for MyDoom, Gary Funck, 09:06
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Jack L. Stone, 08:36
- Re: occasional loop, Nancy McGough, 02:22
February 02, 2004
- Re: Who Is This Addressed To & How Do I Stop This Spam?, Gerald V. Livingston II, 23:32
- Re: Who Is This Addressed To & How Do I Stop This Spam?, Marvin Pierce, 23:14
- Re: Who Is This Addressed To & How Do I Stop This Spam?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:28
- Re: Who Is This Addressed To & How Do I Stop This Spam?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:56
- Who Is This Addressed To & How Do I Stop This Spam?, Marvin Pierce, 19:20
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', Dallman Ross, 17:54
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, LuKreme, 17:08
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, LuKreme, 17:08
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, LuKreme, 16:57
- Re: occasional loop, LuKreme, 16:43
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', Professional Software Engineering, 16:29
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:08
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:40
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Professional Software Engineering, 15:19
- Re: occasional loop, Bart Schaefer, 15:08
- Re: occasional loop, Professional Software Engineering, 14:16
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Professional Software Engineering, 14:16
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Gerald V. Livingston II, 13:45
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', multimedia-fan, 13:07
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Jack L. Stone, 13:07
- Re: occasional loop, R A Lichtensteiger, 12:19
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Chris Barnes, 11:28
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', Michelle Konzack, 10:59
- block .exe, dll, bat...., Alex Herek, 10:47
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:28
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, JoeHill, 10:07
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Jack L. Stone, 09:50
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:08
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', John Conover, 06:48
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', John Conover, 06:28
- Re: external 'IP-Blacklist', JoeHill, 05:58
- external 'IP-Blacklist', Michelle Konzack, 01:43
- Re: Wormspew forging my address, Michelle Konzack, 01:35
February 01, 2004
- occasional loop, noah, 22:00
- Re: will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Professional Software Engineering, 20:59
- Virus issue..., Linux, 19:45
- will the list admin please firewall 203.197.156.192 - 207, Dan Hollis, 19:05
- Re: recent slew of viruses posted to Procmail list, Santiago Vila, 17:51
- Re[2]: super photos, vlb, 17:27
- smart photos just for you, vlb, 17:27
- Re: recent slew of viruses posted to Procmail list, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:27
- cool images very important, vlb, 17:27
- sexy photos imortant, vlb, 17:27
- cool photo, vlb, 17:27
- Re[3]: super pictures, vlb, 17:27
- Re[3]: cool images private, vlb, 17:18
- smart pictures only for you, schaefer, 17:11
- Re[3]: super photos just for you, vlb, 17:11
- Re[2]: sexy images private, schaefer, 17:11
- smart photo, schaefer, 17:11
- Re[3]: cool photo, schaefer, 17:11
- smart pictures, schaefer, 17:11
- smart pictures, schaefer, 17:05
- recent slew of viruses posted to Procmail list, Professional Software Engineering, 17:05
- cool photos imortant, schaefer, 17:05
- Re[3]: sexy pics very important, schaefer, 17:05
- Re: cool images imortant, vlb, 17:05
- smart picture, schaefer, 17:05
- smart photo, vlb, 17:05
- Re: Wormspew forging my address, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:02
- Re: Wormspew forging my address, Alan Clifford, 16:50
- Re: sexy pictures, schaefer, 16:28
- Wormspew forging my address, Bart Schaefer, 16:28
- super photos private, schaefer, 16:28
- Re[2]: super images only for you, schaefer, 16:28
- cool images very important, schaefer, 16:28
- Re[3]: super images just for you, schaefer, 16:28
- smart pics only for you, schaefer, 16:28
- Re[3]: cool pics private, schaefer, 16:22
- Re: super images only for you, schaefer, 16:15
- sexy pics, schaefer, 16:15
- Re: cool images, schaefer, 16:15
- sexy pics, schaefer, 16:15
- cool photo imortant, schaefer, 16:15
- cool pics, schaefer, 16:15
- sexy pics, schaefer, 16:15
- smart photo, linux, 16:08
- cool picture private, schaefer, 16:08
- Re: cool images private, linux, 16:08
- smart pics, vlb, 16:08
- Re: digital signature tests, Professional Software Engineering, 16:08
- digital signature tests, Michael Helm, 11:33