Dallman wrote,
I don't understand that comment. I just tried it with -I, and
it worked just the same for me.
:0:
* ? formail -IMessage-Id: -R List-Post: Message-Id: -D 1024 listpost.cache
incache
:0:
notincache
That's a surprise. I know that in the past,
formail -I header1: -R header2: header1:
would rename first and delete next, so that all occurrences of header1:
and all of header2: would be removed. I lamented that it would be
easier on human minds if formail processed its arguments in command-line
order, but Philip said that it simply could not make multiple passes
over the input, so that was impossible.
Granted, I'd never tried it in conjunction with -D, but there never
seemed to be an intermediate stage where the original header1:'s were
already gone but the header2:'s were named to header1: yet were still
around.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail