Aaaah. I forgot about running a recipe just to collect the info. Thanks!
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, LuKreme wrote:
:0 h
* CLEANFROM=|formail -IReply-To: -rtzxTo:
:0 h
* $ ^Subject:$WS*\/[^$WS].*
{ SUBJECT=$MATCH }
I tried this on the Reply-To field (From ) - that *does* result in way too
many FPs.
is what I would likely do. Course, the subject tagging is optional.
I already tag all Reply-Tos and Subjects at the onset of my RCs.
BTW< I would think you would get far too many hits on this based on
people who have email addresses of first initial last name (jsmith,
bwilliams, eharlan, etc).
As I said, this is probably a self-defeating situation simply because of
this - but as long as I keep the recipe at the end of my string of
recipes, most of the "good" names will already have been sorted into
folders. This is one of the reasons I wanted both the digraph *and* the
From: account field - makes it easier to tweak the digraph listing.
Thanks for the prompt response!
- fleet -
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail