At 18:27 2005-04-29 +0200, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
If I was moderator of this list, I would
block messages with > 50 lines in the body.
I'm not the moderator, but I have access to the list management interface
(granted by the moderator -- it allows for dealing with rampant auto-reply
users and the like).
However, some recipe discussions can easily exceed that size.
Since the beginning of April, five of your own messages would have been
rejected based on a 50 line limit. 20 of Dallman's would have been, six of
mine, many of Michelles', and various other people (91 posts in all).
Perhaps a more workable solution for now would be to simply ask that people
don't post an excess of log content. The only purpose I saw to the log
details was possibly for some sort of bragging rights.
I much prefer a message with too much content than a message with
attachments though.
Here's a solution for you Rudd:
:0B:
* H ?? ^X-BeenThere: procmail(_at_)lists\(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen\(_dot_)DE
* -50^0
* 1^1 ^
procmail-bloat.mbx
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail