procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: is procmail abandonware?

2005-06-12 20:57:25
At 20:25 2005-06-12 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 PSE-L(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org wrote:
At 12:35 2005-06-12 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
I may have found a bug in procmail (or maybe I'm just misinterpreting
the manpage ;)

There's a known bug with the 3.22 version of procmail where enabling H on a recipe causes all further recipes to act as if H is enabled on them.

Given that this bug was fixed in the -beta version of procmail on Sep 15, 2001, I have to ask: has procmail been abandoned?

No, but some of the key people in it have become rather busy -- Phillip Guenther works at Sendmail now - pretty much since he took that job, be's not heen heard from on this list. Myself and another listmember established contact with him of sorts - I dropped the ball on my part because I had just recently purchased a new home and was (still am) doing rennovation.

I need to dredge up my notes on that contact and move forward with it again.


---
 Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering

 Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
 Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies.  I'll get my copy from the list.


____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>