Procmail (date)
June 30, 2005
- Re: includerc, explicit to:, /dev/null, Matthias Haeker, 18:08
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 17:50
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 17:47
- Re: new spam filtering rule, George Yanos, 15:47
- Re: virBL, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:08
- Re: includerc, explicit to:, /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:03
- Re: virBL (was Re: new spam filtering rule), Professional Software Engineering, 14:41
- Re: includerc, explicit to:, /dev/null, Michelle Konzack, 14:19
- includerc, explicit to:, /dev/null, Robert Cazares, 13:56
- Re: virBL (was Re: new spam filtering rule), Chris Payne, 12:45
- Re: virBL (was Re: new spam filtering rule), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:42
- Re: virBL (was Re: new spam filtering rule), Professional Software Engineering, 12:39
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Professional Software Engineering, 12:37
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Professional Software Engineering, 12:31
- Re: virBL (was Re: new spam filtering rule), Chris Payne, 11:45
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:03
- Re: regarding spambouncer.org, Michael J Wise, 09:38
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Michelle Konzack, 09:36
- regarding spambouncer.org, Mr Duck, 09:31
- Re: sorting messages by +tags (bob+tag(_at_)isp(_dot_)com), Jake Di Toro, 06:08
- Re: sorting messages by +tags (bob+tag(_at_)isp(_dot_)com), Jake Di Toro, 05:51
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 05:46
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Michelle Konzack, 03:41
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Michelle Konzack, 02:48
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Michelle Konzack, 02:46
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Michelle Konzack, 02:45
- [slightly OT] new spam filtering rule, Troy Piggins, 00:57
June 29, 2005
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Professional Software Engineering, 21:34
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Matthias Haeker, 17:49
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 17:05
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Damian Menscher, 16:21
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Professional Software Engineering, 16:17
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Professional Software Engineering, 16:14
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 16:10
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 15:50
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Gerald V. Livingston II, 15:48
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:42
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 15:33
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:29
- small add-on for procmail-3.22-secpatch.diff, Ariel Biener, 15:26
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 15:03
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Michelle Konzack, 14:46
- Re: genuine email got blocked as spam, Francesco Peeters, 14:36
- genuine email got blocked as spam, Matthias Haeker, 14:23
- Re: sorting messages by +tags (bob+tag(_at_)isp(_dot_)com), jeff covey, 12:23
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:14
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Professional Software Engineering, 11:07
- Re: questions about anchoring, Professional Software Engineering, 11:03
- Re: Procmail, sendmail and external forwarding from /etc/aliases, Professional Software Engineering, 11:00
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Professional Software Engineering, 10:55
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Professional Software Engineering, 10:52
- Re: questions about anchoring, Mr Duck, 10:01
- Re: questions about anchoring, Dallman Ross, 09:28
- Re: Procmail, sendmail and external forwarding from /etc/aliases, Bart Schaefer, 09:17
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Matthias Haeker, 08:58
- Re: questions about anchoring, Mr Duck, 08:46
- Re: sorting messages by +tags (bob+tag(_at_)isp(_dot_)com), Jake Di Toro, 08:44
- Re: questions about anchoring, Jake Di Toro, 08:38
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Patrick Shanahan, 06:49
- sorting messages by +tags (bob+tag(_at_)isp(_dot_)com), jeff covey, 06:35
- Re: questions about anchoring, Mr Duck, 06:28
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:30
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:07
- Fwd: new spam filtering rule, Matthias =?unknown?q?H=E4ker?=, 03:58
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Francesco Peeters, 02:41
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:22
June 28, 2005
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Matthias =?unknown?q?H=E4ker?=, 23:05
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Francesco Peeters, 15:43
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Alan Clifford, 14:27
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Professional Software Engineering, 11:46
- Re: Procmail, sendmail and external forwarding from /etc/aliases, Professional Software Engineering, 11:45
- Re: Procmail, sendmail and external forwarding from /etc/aliases, Professional Software Engineering, 11:39
- Re: Procmail, sendmail and external forwarding from /etc/aliases, Bart Schaefer, 09:56
- Re: procmail on a pass thru unix mail server, Matt Garretson, 09:13
- Procmail, sendmail and external forwarding from /etc/aliases, Evgeni Vachkov, 07:45
- questions about anchoring, Mr Duck, 06:25
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:58
- Re: new spam filtering rule, Dallman Ross, 02:00
- new spam filtering rule, Professional Software Engineering, 01:22
June 21, 2005
- Re: Detaching e-mail attachment to a folder automatically, Mandeep Gill, 19:12
- re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Professional Software Engineering, 16:50
- Re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Professional Software Engineering, 13:42
- Re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Dallman Ross, 12:34
- re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Mr Duck, 12:29
- Re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Damian Menscher, 12:13
- Re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Professional Software Engineering, 12:05
- Re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Damian Menscher, 09:28
- Re: Forwarding via procmail, Josh Kelley, 05:09
- Re: recipe blocking mail with attachements, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:52
- Re: Detaching e-mail attachment to a folder automatically, Michelle Konzack, 04:18
- recipe blocking mail with attachements, Wilhelm du Plessis, 04:06
- Detaching e-mail attachment to a folder automatically, mandeep, 01:30
June 14, 2005
- Troubles assigning chain of shell pipes to a variable, Justin Gombos, 23:40
- Troubles assigning chain of shell pipes to a variable, Justin Gombos, 23:39
- sendmail & procmail problem!!!, Narayanan Subramaniam, 23:38
- Re: sendmail & procmail problem!!!, Google Kreme, 23:37
- Re: Troubles assigning chain of shell pipes to a variable, Volker Kuhlmann, 23:36
- Re: is procmail abandonware?, Udi Mottelo, 04:25
June 12, 2005
- Re: is procmail abandonware?, Professional Software Engineering, 20:57
- is procmail abandonware?, Damian Menscher, 18:41
- Re: procmail bug? {nested blocks}, Professional Software Engineering, 11:48
- Re: procmail bug? {nested blocks}, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:29
- procmail bug? {nested blocks}, Damian Menscher, 10:58
- Re: RMAIL. How to use spamassassin where the headers are appearing on messages already., Michelle Konzack, 07:01
- RMAIL. How to use spamassassin where the headers are appearing on messages already., Don Saklad, 05:45
June 08, 2005
- Re: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA", Bart Schaefer, 15:50
- OT _ Re: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA", David Turley, 11:25
- Re: "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA", David W. Tamkin, 11:02
- "DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA", Kim Sloan, 10:53
- Re: Problem when filtering with lynx, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:29
- Problem when filtering with lynx, Hatto von Hatzfeld, 01:35
June 07, 2005
- Re: Howto extract multiple emailadresse from the to: header field valid for the local domain, Matthias Häker, 23:49
- Re: How can I change a domain or extract only a username from ^TO, Dallman Ross, 16:59
- Re: [mybucket] Re: running procmail over an mbox file, Patrick Shanahan, 16:55
- Re: [mybucket] Re: running procmail over an mbox file, Patrick Shanahan, 15:17
- RE: running procmail over an mbox file, Gary Funck, 14:45
- Re: [mybucket] Re: running procmail over an mbox file, Luke Vanderfluit, 14:34
- Re: running procmail over an mbox file, Udi Mottelo, 08:16
- Re: How can I change a domain or extract only a username from ^TO, Daniel Siechniewicz, 07:43
- Re: running procmail over an mbox file, S.A. Birl, 06:50
- Re: running procmail over an mbox file, Professional Software Engineering, 06:47
- running procmail over an mbox file, Luke Vanderfluit, 05:46
- Re: Howto extract multiple emailadresse from the to: header field valid for the local domain, Dallman Ross, 03:13
June 06, 2005
- Howto extract multiple emailadresse from the to: header field valid for the local domain, mhaeker, 18:24
- Re: Replacing mail items, Don Russell, 16:21
- Re: Replacing mail items, Volker Kuhlmann, 15:33
- Re: Replacing mail items, Professional Software Engineering, 13:15
- Re: Replacing mail items, Michelle Konzack, 11:55
- Re: Replacing mail items, Dallman Ross, 11:32
- Replacing mail items, Don Russell, 11:10
June 05, 2005
- Re: unhtml for one account, Dallman Ross, 16:27
- Re: recipe example, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 16:12
- unhtml for one account, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina, 16:00
- Re: recipe example, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina, 15:59
- Re: recipe example, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 15:13
- recipe example, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina, 14:51
June 03, 2005
- Re: POP3 and IMAP coexistent, Michael J Wise, 09:32
- Re: How can I change a domain or extract only a username from ^TO, Dallman Ross, 08:17
- outsourcing (Was Re: procmail recipe), NM Public, 08:15
- procmail locking, dave, 08:06
- Re: How can I change a domain or extract only a username from ^TO, Dallman Ross, 08:06
- Re: procmail recipe, Dallman Ross, 08:04
- Re: procmail recipe, Tim Macrina, 06:51
- Re: POP3 and IMAP coexistent, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:44
- How can I change a domain or extract only a username from ^TO, Daniel Siechniewicz, 06:42
- Re: POP3 and IMAP coexistent, Dallman Ross, 06:20
- Re: recipe fails on one of several similar messages, fleet, 06:08
- Re: POP3 and IMAP coexistent, Google Kreme, 05:56
- Re: Mark as read, Google Kreme, 05:51
- POP3 and IMAP coexistent, powtac, 05:47
- Re: procmail recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:13
- Re: Mark as read, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:03
- Re: procmail recipe, Dallman Ross, 01:12
- Re: Mark as read, Dallman Ross, 00:43
June 02, 2005
- Re: recipe fails on one of several similar messages, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 23:54
- recipe fails on one of several similar messages, fleet, 20:58
- Re: Mark as read, Google Kreme, 20:28
- Re: Mark as read, Professional Software Engineering, 20:21
- Re: procmail recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 20:19
- Re: Mark as read, Alan Clifford, 20:11
- Re: procmail recipe, Matee Moshkovits, 20:11
- Re: Mark as read, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 14:34
- Re: procmail recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 14:31
- Re: Mark as read, Dallman Ross, 10:01
- Mark as read, Rob Campbell, 09:06
- Re: procmail recipe, Tim Macrina, 08:44
- Re: procmail recipe, Dallman Ross, 08:33
- Re: "if" with INCLUDERC - possible?, Dallman Ross, 08:12
- Re: procmail recipe, Tim Macrina, 08:10
- Re: procmail recipe, Tim Macrina, 08:03
- Re: procmail recipe, Dallman Ross, 08:03
- Re: procmail recipe, Matee Moshkovits, 07:29
- "if" with INCLUDERC - possible?, schnitzel meister, 07:22
- procmail recipe, Tim Macrina, 07:19