Re: sending spam to /dev/null

procmail

Re: sending spam to /dev/null

2005-07-24 14:54:08

Chris schreef:

Damian Menscher:

  :0
  * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
  * autolearn=spam
  /dev/null

  :0:
  * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
  junk


you have
two recipes, one that on X-Spam-Status: Yes autolearns then sends spam
to /dev/null the other on X-Spam-Status: Yes sends spam to your junk
folder, doesn't the first recipe cancel out the 2nd?


The first recipe has two conditions. Such conditions are AND-ed, so they
need both to be true.

-- 
Grtz, Ruud


____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Damian Menscher Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Damian Menscher Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol <= Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Damian Menscher Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Google Kreme Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Michelle Konzack Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Patrick Shanahan Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Alan Clifford Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris

Previous by Date:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Ruud H.G. van Tol
Next by Date:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Damian Menscher
Previous by Thread:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris
Next by Thread:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Ruud H.G. van Tol
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]