Re: sending spam to /dev/null

procmail

Re: sending spam to /dev/null

2005-07-25 10:44:43

On 24 Jul 2005, at 16:07 , Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:

I don't recommend 'autolearn'. Certainly not for a mailserver that
handles the mail of many different recipients. At least a user  
should be
able to switch it off for their mail.


Autolearn, like procmail, is per user, not server-wide.

It is the most effective anti-spam setting in SA.

-- 
<http://2blog.kreme.com>


____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Damian Menscher Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Damian Menscher Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null (viagra autolearn=spam), Damian Menscher Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Google Kreme <= Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Michelle Konzack Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Patrick Shanahan Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Alan Clifford Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Chris Re: sending spam to /dev/null, G.W. Haywood Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol

Previous by Date:	Re: identifying no "From" header, Udi Mottelo
Next by Date:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol
Previous by Thread:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol
Next by Thread:	Re: sending spam to /dev/null, Ruud H.G. van Tol
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]