procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Request to remove urcqugak(_at_)trashmail(_dot_)net from the procmail list

2007-08-03 12:14:32
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Professional Software Engineering wrote:

PSE> At 08:17 2007-08-03 +0100, Alan Clifford wrote:
PSE> >It is.  But you can use procmail defensively for this sort of thing.  I
PSE> >use the address "lists(_at_)clifford(_dot_)ac" for posting to lists and 
if a mail to
PSE> >lists@ is not from one of my subscribed lists, it is considered spam.
PSE> 
PSE> 
PSE> Er, uh...
PSE> 
PSE> What about when people ON the lists reply offlist, with good reason, say 
PSE> because the topic has turned from list topical?
PSE> 
PSE> 
PSE> Certainly, I apply a higher degree of spammishness to my list addresses 
PSE> versus personal correspondance addresses (in my algorythm, all I have to 
do 
PSE> is set a running tab a bit higher because the message was addressed to a 
PSE> "publicly harvestable" address), but the address isn't otherwise just 
PSE> considered spam.
PSE> 

I don't want people to send me personal email at the lists@ address.  


-- 
Alan


( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list.  Please
  address personal email to alan+1@ as lists@ is not read. )
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>